Showing posts with label Healthcare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Healthcare. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 26, 2011

We Can Create a Cervical Cancer-Free America

AMERICAN FORUM

By Jennifer S. Smith, Ph.D., M.P.H.

Kristen Forbes of Noblesville, Indiana, had recently graduated from college when she was diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer at age 22. After a yearlong, painful battle, she succumbed to the disease, leaving behind a bright future and grieving family members and friends.

Like most of the 4,000 women in the United States who die of cervical cancer each year, Kristen’s death was preventable. We now have the medical know-how and the tools to stamp out this major cancer once and for all. What we need now, as our country honors National Cervical Cancer Awareness Month this January, is the will among members of the public health community – government officials and policymakers, medical professionals, insurers, women and others – to make it happen.

Cervical cancer used to be the leading cause of death for women in the U.S. With widespread use of Pap test screening in the last 50 years, cervical cancer rates have declined significantly, but have leveled to about 12,000 cases each year. This disease should be relatively easy to prevent. We know it’s caused by the human papillomavirus, or HPV, a common sexually transmitted infection. Most HPV infections go away on their own, but persistent HPV infections can lead to cell changes that can progress to cervical cancer. Fortunately, with proper treatment, the disease can usually be stopped before cancer develops.

The HPV vaccine is now available and prevents infection from the two types of HPV that are responsible for 70 percent of all cervical cancers. We have an established screening tool – the Pap test – that identifies cell changes that can signal cervical disease or cancer. We also have newer technology – the HPV test – to help identify women who are at increased risk.

So how can we make sure no more women die of cervical cancer?

First, we need to increase HPV vaccination rates. The HPV vaccine is recommended for routine administration in girls ages 11 and 12, with a “catch up” provision for those up to age 26. Studies show, though, that less than one in two young adolescent girls has received it.

We also need to increase screening rates. At least half of all cervical cancer deaths are due to a lack of screening. Yet about 25 percent of women in the U.S. have not been screened in the past three years. Importantly, women who have been vaccinated still need to be screened to protect against HPV types not targeted by the vaccine.

Also, while the Pap test has led to a dramatic decrease in cervical cancer in the U.S., about one third of cervical cancer deaths are caused by screening errors with the Pap test, a problem that more sensitive HPV DNA testing could address. The HPV test is available, in conjunction with a Pap test, for women ages 30 and older.

Most importantly, we need to make cervical cancer prevention a top national health priority. Public health officials and policymakers should support--and fund--programs to educate women about this disease and enable them to access prevention and treatment services. Medical professionals should educate their patients and provide these services, and insurers should pay for them. Women must take charge of their health and get screened and ensure that their adolescent daughters get vaccinated. All of these groups’ efforts must be coordinated for maximum efficiency and impact.

The elimination of cervical cancer is an eminently achievable goal. To achieve this vision, a new program – Cervical Cancer-Free America (www.cervicalcancerfreeamerica.org) – is driving state and local prevention programs, and ensuring that successful strategies are shared among the states. The initiative is led by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Gillings School of Global Public Health.

Since the initiative’s launch last year, six states – Alabama, California, Indiana, Kentucky, North Carolina and Texas – have already joined the effort to become “cervical cancer-free.” Major universities and other public health experts are leading the charge in each state, supported by government and other leaders.

The movement to eradicate cervical cancer is gaining momentum in our country. But there is more work to be done. Let’s join hands and work together to ensure that no more women like Kristen Forbes lose their lives to this preventable disease.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Smith is director of Cervical Cancer-Free America.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright (C) 2011 by the American Forum. 1/11

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Imagining a World with Paid Sick Days

AMERICAN FORUM

By Linda Meric

There are many areas of life in this country where it appears that we live in two worlds. And that’s no different when we consider paid sick days. In the first world, if you’re sick, you stay home from work, take care of yourself, and have the time to get better.

In the second world, if you’re sick, you go to work anyway. In the second world, you go to work, even when your child is sick. You know that if you stay home, you’ll lose pay – or maybe even your job.

As we approach Women’s Equality Day on August 26, the day that marks the 90th anniversary of women’s right to vote, it’s troubling that so many of the workers who live in the second world are women. According to the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, more than 22 million women workers lack paid sick days. And though women still bear the brunt of care-giving duties in most American families, we are also the least likely to have a paid sick day available to care for a sick child. Fifty-three percent of working mothers, as compared to 48 percent of working fathers, lack a paid sick day they can use to care for a child.

The U.S. is one of only four industrialized nations that do not offer a national standard of paid sick days. It just isn’t right. I wonder what the suffragettes, who worked so hard and so long to win women’s right to vote, would say about the lack of this basic workplace standard.

Let me tell you about Tahirah.

She and her young daughter live in a world without paid sick days. Twenty-something Tahirah had achieved a milestone in life: she finally had her dream job -- crew leader in a Denver airport restaurant with a clear path to the management track. There was just one problem: her daughter suffers with asthma and Tahirah had no paid sick days.

She managed to make it work for a while. Then, one day, her daughter had a brutal asthmatic episode. Her daycare provider called to inform Tahirah that she should meet her at the hospital emergency room. But her supervisor withheld the information -- until the lunch rush was done and he didn’t need Tahirah at work anymore.

The incident forced her to quit that job.

Seventy-eight percent of workers employed in hospitality and food service, and 69 percent of workers employed in administration and office work, lack paid sick days. This is a serious concern because, like Tahirah, they are the workers who have the most intimate contact with the public. The lack of paid sick days isn’t just an issue for family care-givers, it’s an issue of public health, as we saw during last year’s H1N1 flu epidemic. We all are at risk when workers lack the opportunity to stay home and get better without the possibility of spreading contagions to the rest of us.

There’s something else, too: Economic justice.

In these tough times, with families struggling mightily to hang on, to keep a roof overhead and food on the table, it seems particularly punitive that a worker could lose income or even lose a job simply for getting sick or for having a sick child. What would Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony and Sojourner Truth have to say about how the lack of paid sick days disenfranchises women and their families?

Hundreds of 9to5 members and activists think those courageous women would deeply identify with the paid sick days movement. That’s why we’ve chosen Women’s Equality Day for 9to5’s National Day of Action -- Healthy Workplaces: Paid Sick Days Now!

On August 26, we will organize events around the country, from Sacramento to Washington, D.C., and call for Congress to pass the Healthy Families Act, federal legislation proposed by the late Sen. Edward Kennedy and Rep. Rosa DeLauro, that would guarantee up to seven paid sick days a year.

It’s time that the U.S. joined other industrialized countries around the globe and made this one America; one where no worker has to choose between the family she loves and the job she needs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meric is executive director of 9to5, National Association of Working Women. For information on a Women’s Equality Day event near you, contact activist@9to5.org.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright (C) 2010 by the American Forum. 8/10


AMERICAN FORUM

By Linda Meric

When his first two children were born, Daniel Wells didn’t even think of asking his employer for leave. But when his wife became pregnant with the third, he better understood the need to bond with a new baby.

So Daniel, an arborist, requested time off following the birth. He was shocked when he got the answer: request denied. The company said it couldn’t get along without him, not even for a few weeks, and cited a “substantial economic harm” clause in denying the leave.

After the birth, Daniel found himself back at work in three days – instead of three weeks.

“I guess it was just as well. We were already struggling,” he says, “And taking unpaid time might have harmed more than helped.” Still, in his heart, Daniel recognizes that more than anything, more than new ties or new toys, Dads like him need paid, job-protected time away from work for major events in their family lives.

As another Father’s Day approaches, it’s fitting that we consider new Dads, as well as Moms, and paid family leave. Most countries provide at least 10 weeks of paid leave for new mothers; some countries offer paid leave for both parents. Only four countries provide no paid parental leave at all – and the United States is one of them.

But all parents should be able to stay home to care for a new baby and Father’s Day is a good time to push for paid family leave.

The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 was a significant step forward for working families because it granted the right to take up to 12 weeks off to care for a new child or a seriously ill family member. Unfortunately, it also has several limitations. It applies only to workplaces with 50 or more employees, and there are longevity and hours worked requirements that leave some workers out. There are exceptions like economic harm, and, worst of all, it provides
only for unpaid leave. Many families cannot afford to take FMLA leave because they cannot afford the loss of income.

Paid family leave improves infant health. Babies have more bonding time during the period of critical early development and their mothers are more able to breastfeed, reducing childhood illness and the risk of childhood obesity. Paid family leave and time off before returning to work is also healthier for mothers. Paid paternity leave is good for fathers, too. Ellen Galinsky of the Family and Work Institute says fathers also experience significant work-life conflict, and paid leave can be a financial and mental health lifesaver.

There are benefits of paid leave beyond even parenthood. Paid family leave allows seniors and the chronically ill to be independent longer, recover quicker and stay out of nursing homes. Studies show that businesses also benefit from paid leave because it reduces turnover costs and helps workers stay attached to their jobs.

In these tough economic times, everyone is compromised by the lack of paid family leave in the U.S.

But there’s hope.

The legislatures of five states are currently examining California and New Jersey’s lead, employee-funded arrangements that provide compensation to take time off to care for an ill family member or to bond with a new child. In addition, President Obama’s 2011 budget would establish a $50 million State Paid Leave Fund within the Department of Labor that would provide competitive grants to help states cover start-up costs. The budget also provides resources to improve the collection of data related to the intersection of work and family responsibilities. It must be approved.

As we celebrate dear ole’ Dad isn't it time to enact policies that provide support for mothers – and fathers – who want to be both good parents and effective family breadwinners, too?

Isn’t it time America had a paid family leave policy?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Meric is Executive Director of 9to5, National Association of Working Women.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright (C) 2010 by American Forum. 6/2